|
The Black Roots of Slavery
Michael P. Tremoglie
FrontPageMagazine.com
| June 7, 2001
"SO WE REALLY can't blame the Europeans--we sold
ourselves, " said the African-American tourist to his African
guide.
"It takes two," replied the guide. "Greed!
Money!"
"Greed," echoed the tourist.
This conversation was from a 1998 episode of The History Channel
concerning the African slave trade.
The common version of the trans-Atlantic slave trade, the version
taught in school and popularized by the TV miniseries Roots
is not true. This version had Europeans invading inland Africa,
capturing Africans, enslaving them and spiriting them off to the
Americas. This version is more fiction than fact--a fact well known
by many African-Americans. I recall a magazine article, written some
years ago by an African journalist, in which he tells of members of
black organizations in Harlem inveighing against the Africans who
enslaved them.
Rarely, if ever, did Europeans travel to the African inland. Maps
from the period indicate that Europeans knew nothing of the African
interior. Before the trans-Atlantic trade, there was a thriving
trans-Saharan slave trade. Slave trading was an entrenched
institution in Africa, well before the arrival of the Europeans.
This I learned from the Encyclopedia Britannica.
Of course none of this will be found in the mainstream media or in
Hollywood. What you will find is the leftist anti-American version,
which portrays slavery as an invention of white Europeans who invade
Africa and abscond with slaves. However, the African slave trade
more resembled a Venetian trading expedition than a Viking raid.
The slave trade was an economic partnership initially between Arabs
and Africans. It was later the Europeans entered the market. There
is documentary evidence to indicate that the relationship between
the African slave sellers and their European customers was quite
collegial. Even to the extent that the offspring of African sellers
were taken to England and America to be educated there and returned
home.
The slave trade with the Europeans was so profitable for African
nations that when Britain abolished the trade in 1807, many African
nations protested. The Chief of the Ashanti nation wanted to know
"if the slave trade was so good before why is it so bad
now?"
African women also were involved in the business. One, Fenda
Lawrence, operated a slave trading business on an island in the
Gambia River. She later traveled to the colony of Georgia with an
affidavit according her the rights of a free person.
There were many free blacks in the American colonies. They were
enfranchised and as early as 1641, Mathias De Sousa, were elected to
legislatures. These free blacks owned slaves--some for philanthropic
reasons, as Carter G. Woodson suggests. However as John Hope
Franklin wrote, "...free Negroes had a real economic interest
in the institution of slavery and held slaves in order to improve
their economic status."
The census of 1830 lists 965 free black slave owners in Louisiana,
owning 4,206 slaves. The state of South Carolina, lists 464 free
blacks owning 2,715 slaves. How ironic it is that so many blacks
owned so many slaves in South Carolina. Yet, no one seemed to
mention this during the flag controversy.
Some blacks served in the Confederate army, which is another
omission in our popular culture. The movie Glory did not
happen to mention that blacks served in the Confederate army. It did
give the impression that the black soldiers in the 54th
Massachusetts were former slaves-- which was not true.
Unfortunately the average American is unaware of these historical
facts. Yet despite leftist academicians the true history is being
told--mostly by African and African-American political leaders,
historians, and journalists.
In 1998, President Clinton visited Uganda and offered an apology to
Africans for slavery. Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni replied,
" African chiefs were the ones waging war on each other and
capturing their own people and selling them. If anyone should
apologize, it should be the African chiefs. We still have those
traitors here even today."
Just within the past few months African Director Roger Ngoan M'Bala,
from Cote d 'Ivoire, made a movie Adanggaman
that delves into the origin of the African
slave trade. The movie seems to be shown everywhere except the
United States. Predictably M'Bala is being criticized as absolving
whites from guilt. What M'Bala is really doing is revealing that
there is enough guilt to go around for everybody.
Before Congress votes for reparations let them vote when all the
facts are known-not just the facts that those politicians, lawyers,
and " community activists " who exploit the issue for
their own personal gain want known.
|